one who notice Greyness among the Green vast options open up
who Look forward Green pastures... probably misses clue for alternate ideas.
This refers to Chromakey technique uses Green screen adopted for a special-effects in motion picture industry for a long time. But much earlier the preferred colour was Blue as in Blue-screen process.
I wish not to dwell upon the choice of colour for painting, but to point out other options available. Here is an example I just stumbled upon, a discussion on black matte by eminent people in the near past yr.2010, but leaves with no solution. How they probably could know an idea that was dormant in my mind since yr.1987than one find in any print form and now its called as Dgtl-matte
Ref: http://bit.ly/W2mFyg
Introducing Dgtl matte
Dark-grey trans-lit matte which is self-explanatory and uses a very thinly coated Gray background which is backlit with LED or a suitable light source. I was talking on FS [Flash-selection] matting which is an advanced and complex one to explain than Dgtl matte. So I commence with Dgtl matting .
Dgtl matte [Dark grey translit matte]*.
It is quite self-explanatory but is it just all about?
Not really, chromakey follows color-difference which is rather vague idea. But in Dgtl matting I have infused a better strategy called state of change. This is enabled by switching back-light on/off or change intensity in quick succession at every alternate frame or within the capture of single frame [intra frame].
[Dark grey translit matte]* _patent
On execution the colour of the background can be varied to a vast range of colours. The bellow colour palette gives a rough idea of variation that can be attained. The base colour refers to colour of background at prior state, and the changed colour refers to state of change on activating a change with back-light.
Dgtl matte takes into consideration to address as many as 17 constrains related to usual chromakey method. Dgtl matting based on a better idea where the execution is very digital-like by making use of difference of state of change i.e, yes/no, on/off. So inherently it can expected to be 10 times more precise than chromakey an arbitrary scale of comparison. I would assume that it could replace or augment chromakey method. It’s not bad an idea even if it undergoes a natural obsolescence, as it has served almost 65 years in motion picture industry, a long period.
For More details: http://dgtl-matte.weebly.com another site on FS matte: http://cinehifx.weebly.com
Sounds just lateral thinking or predicting a much broader pic [an Oscar India]
Dgtl matte-year 1987
Flash-selection [Fs] matte - year 2002
Ref: http://bit.ly/W2mFyg
Introducing Dgtl matte
Dark-grey trans-lit matte which is self-explanatory and uses a very thinly coated Gray background which is backlit with LED or a suitable light source. I was talking on FS [Flash-selection] matting which is an advanced and complex one to explain than Dgtl matte. So I commence with Dgtl matting .
Dgtl matte [Dark grey translit matte]*.
It is quite self-explanatory but is it just all about?
Not really, chromakey follows color-difference which is rather vague idea. But in Dgtl matting I have infused a better strategy called state of change. This is enabled by switching back-light on/off or change intensity in quick succession at every alternate frame or within the capture of single frame [intra frame].
[Dark grey translit matte]* _patent
On execution the colour of the background can be varied to a vast range of colours. The bellow colour palette gives a rough idea of variation that can be attained. The base colour refers to colour of background at prior state, and the changed colour refers to state of change on activating a change with back-light.
Dgtl matte takes into consideration to address as many as 17 constrains related to usual chromakey method. Dgtl matting based on a better idea where the execution is very digital-like by making use of difference of state of change i.e, yes/no, on/off. So inherently it can expected to be 10 times more precise than chromakey an arbitrary scale of comparison. I would assume that it could replace or augment chromakey method. It’s not bad an idea even if it undergoes a natural obsolescence, as it has served almost 65 years in motion picture industry, a long period.
For More details: http://dgtl-matte.weebly.com another site on FS matte: http://cinehifx.weebly.com
Sounds just lateral thinking or predicting a much broader pic [an Oscar India]
Dgtl matte-year 1987
Flash-selection [Fs] matte - year 2002
Petro Vlahos [late]– Green Screen & Special Effects Pioneer Aged 96 Petro Vlahos, a two-time Academy Award winner whose blue- and green-screen technique on movies like "Mary Poppins" and "Ben Hur" made the modern blockbuster possible
some of my ideas _just a scribble
I always like photographers with small camera in hand, Yes I may be refering to Leica, or perhaps non DSLR like
Otherwards I very much dislike people with heavy gear. After many years photogrphy I realised feasiblity with 50mm~80 mm prime lens one could produce better image. moderate zoom is ok.
I have also noticed the reason for a photographer adopt zoom lens [tele] for shallow depth of field. Digital photography compelled to adopt sensors with much smaller size than 35mm.
Unfortunatly Depth of field is primairly a function of size of capture or Film is used by an exponential factor. DOF is neither a focal length or even not relient on aperture. A 35 mm in fil may have natural DOF as that of our vision. But in digital the 645 would have more pleasing DOF that is natural. Further we could increase the iso in digital in order to cut down aperture if we want.
I would even imaging a standard 645 camera zoom lens with moderate range*.
1. To automatically expose sequence of images with various focal lengths as we click a shot. Then a image process routine where the more DOF due wide angle are merged with the image coposed as per composed with 645 format. I still state DOF is not a function of focal lenght [wide angle]
2. Moderate zoom + Digital zoom to achive a large zoom as there is high pixel count with645 which is 60 MB
There the digital camera specially the smaller one with small size of capture the chip will inherantly have huge depth of field by default.
Haven't we have undersone Down scale 8x10>35mm>even2asmaller size Digital >we called it Revolution.
Now a change is Back ward up scale > full frame getting prevalent >then Sony with 645sensor [yes 645 was already there] but the change we could tahke a 4k movie > it will then mean an Evolution.
The question is why not all Cameras full-frame or 645. one can reason the cost factor. But we are almost 10 years in digital. Long enough to cut short cost.
Yes I like your small camera, preferbly with full frame sensor[35mm]
please vist my page http://primepixelcg.weebly.com
* the idea of mine on 3rd may 2014
In The context of:
Apple demands $2billion_ infringe case. what if 4 Lightfield the advanced any aspect _Mobile,Tab in future. My flash-select stands next.
or
De Code Dormant_Davinci ={Nokia _MS now=Pervasive Computing=Mobile+Tabs=Photo,Snetwrking=Lightfield/FlashSelect_matting}
I have said Davinci code still dormant- as he is or as appear to be for he is the proponent concept now known as LIGHT-FIELD. No wonder an OSCAR be awarded but who to receive for Leonardo da Vinci ?
http://lightfield-forum.com/2012/08/lightfield-history-who-invented-the-concept-of-the-light-field/
In the long run since his proponment many academic bodies, individual researchers have worked. we even have a consumer type camera based on this concept. Light field similar in the form that a magnet has a magnetic field, so complex I am afraid I am yet to understand the subject. It is expected light field can be applied as a matting technique. so naturally it can happen to replace Blue-matte technique that we have been prevalently using in motion picture industry. The Contributor of Blue matte has been honoured with OSCAR. we can easily expect similar honour to Light field.
many people hold patent on various aspects, derivative of Light-field. Ms Microsoft also happens to have aquired/ submitted for patent in this regard. One would also notice MS hold a patent in the name of Flash-matting. This is nothing but a rechristened version my ideas called Flash-selection matting 2003 been plagiarised.
A Phone or a Tab also mean pervasive computing. Photography and social networking are main aspects to iPhone or iPad. Reason why Noika deal getting finalised 25th April2014. I am assuming iPhone , iPad will not have feature that a Nokia could afford. It is a inbuilt feature to automatically removing cluttered, undesired background detail, in as much close as real time.